← evalmy.page
Public scorecard

linear.app

Audited 6/13/2026

77/ 100
Good
AI citations: 50% (3/6)
linear.app

AI Readiness

Partial AI presence: linear.app was cited in 3/6 LLM responses. There's clear room to grow your AEO footprint.

best product development tool with AI agents
alternatives to Jira for AI-powered teams
how to automate product planning with AI

Top Issues

1/10

Performance Hints

Performance issues detected: 114 script tags is excessive - this may slow page load significantly; 261KB of inline styles - consider moving to external CSS. Page speed directly impacts conversion rates.

5/10

Headline Clarity

H1 is 152 characters (recommended: under 70). Shorter headlines are easier to scan and more impactful.

7/10

Value Proposition

Descriptive text found near the top, but consider using more benefit-driven language (e.g., 'Save time...', 'Get more...').

4/10

CTA Above Fold

CTA buttons/links exist on the page but may not be above the fold. Move your primary CTA higher so visitors see it without scrolling.

Top Recommendations

  • Remove technical noise and changelog-style data from the hero section to reduce cognitive load for new visitors.
  • Emphasize the 'AI agents' capability as a key differentiator to compete against legacy project management tools.
  • Use benefit-driven subheaders (e.g., 'Make product operations self-driving') to explain the value of specific features immediately.

Watch this page over time

Monitor re-checks your LLM citations every week and alerts you when your score moves — 64 → 81. $29/mo, launching soon.

Want this for your page?

Eval your landing page across LLMs and 10 conversion checks. Free heuristic report. AI eval $5.

Audit by evalmy.page